Resources for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
For all the billions of pounds spent by English higher education institutions over the past 15 years on widening participation initiatives, we know that significant and pervasive inequalities persist regarding access, student experience and outcomes.
The recent IFS Deaton Review highlighted the fact that while 71 per cent of people who attend private secondary schools earn a degree by the age of 26, just 17 per cent of people from the poorest fifth of families do so.
One criticism is that while universities are spending a lot of money, the corresponding evidence base for what works is weaker than it should be. Accordingly, the Office for Students (OfS) has recently consulted on a new approach to the regulation of equality of opportunity that would require providers to do a better job of evaluating the success of interventions.
However, the demands of the goal we are trying to reach should not be underestimated. In our view, more radical reform is required. As we have argued previously, sector-wide collaboration is key to ensuring that we can deliver meaningful change. Yet collaboration requires resource, and this is where we are lacking.
Want to write for THE? Click for more information
While, of course, each autonomous university provider must meet its commitments and obligations regarding widening access and equalising outcomes, there is currently no meaningful regulatory incentive for providers to engage beyond the commitments in the access and participation plans (APPs) that they agree with the OfS. Indeed, there is a clear disincentive for a provider to strongly yoke its APP targets to collaborative activity because if the external stakeholder should fail to deliver, that will rebound on the provider in a regulatory framework that holds individual providers entirely accountable for their own APPs.
This is not to say that collaboration is not happening. A positive example is the Uni Connect programme, which funds 29 regional partnerships across England to work with higher education providers, schools and colleges to deliver outreach activity to under-represented groups. Findings from a recent evaluation show that the programme has succeeded in supporting under-represented groups to access higher education.
Despite this, the OfS has cut Uni Connect’s funding from £60 million in 2020-21 to £30 million in 2022-23. This sends a worrying signal to universities; as they submit their APPs for 2024-25 later this year, how far should they rely on the continued existence of this national programme?
Perhaps there is a political argument that the higher education sector should be doing the work of Uni Connect out of existing budgets. But it is worth noting that this is not the prevailing mindset in other sectors – including those not very far removed from education – that are similarly faced with major inequality challenges.
Find out more about how to get full unlimited article access to THE for staff and students.
Take health. The National Institute of Health Research’s Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (PHIRST) programme has invested about £15 million in establishing six centres to help public health experts in local authorities evaluate the impact of interventions aimed at reducing health inequalities. More recently, the NIHR has invested £50 million in its Health Determinants Research Collaboration programme, which has brought together 10 teams, based within local authorities, to lead on developing a national evidence base for interventions. It is anticipated that a total of 30 collaborations will eventually be funded.
Yet in higher education, we seem to be going backwards. The OfS’ call for individual universities to build and share a stronger evidence base is very welcome. But we think it would do much better to follow health’s lead and invest significantly in a national infrastructure that can build the capacity of practitioners across the sector to develop more effective, evidence-based interventions. That is likely to be the most effective way of ensuring that we are able to deliver on our collective commitment to eliminating educational inequality.
Antony C. Moss is pro vice-chancellor, education and student experience, at London South Bank University, chair of London Uni Connect and deputy director of PHIRST South Bank. Deborah Johnston is deputy vice-chancellor, academic framework, at London South Bank and leads the academic framework across LSBU Group.
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login
Retention, progression and completion data arguably better reflect the work universities do to help students fulfil their potential, says James Miller
Disadvantaged students struggle as private institutions offer discounts and community colleges hope for rebound
The Princeton University president discusses the oversimplification of the free speech debate and his personal journey of discovery kicked off by his son’s school project
New analysis suggests concerns that exam forecasts harm equality ‘are not supported’ by data
Levelling up secretary confirms Sunak government’s change of approach on investment zones, after reports plan has stalled
Country would lose out to competitors if it rolls back two-year work eligibility, leaders warn
Experts say long awaited overhaul is welcome but questions-based approach still leaves some students at more of an advantage
House of Lords committee warns changes ‘make the system less progressive’ and government ‘should have consulted’ on them
Subscribe
If you like what you’re reading online, why not take advantage of our subscription and get unlimited access to all of Times Higher Education‘s content?
You’ll get full access to our website, print and digital editions.
