Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 1240 (2023)
2
Metrics details
Competency is closely related to the occurrence of the behavior. Breastfeeding competence is the mastery of different breastfeeding factors which intervene in breastfeeding behavior. Breastfeeding competence could improve the breastfeeding behavior. However, few studies have paid attention to the status and the influencing factors of breastfeeding competency. The breastfeeding competency of pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy has the greatest impact on breastfeeding behavior after childbirth. Therefore, the objective of this study were to investigate the breastfeeding competency level and independent risk factors for breastfeeding competency among pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy. A cross-sectional survey method and convenience sampling method was used in the study. The general information questionnaire including age, gestational week, educational background, and so on were used to investigate the general information of pregnant women and their husbands. A breastfeeding competency scale (BCS) was used to investigate the breastfeeding competency of pregnant women. The total score of the BCS ranges from 38 to 190, with higher scores indicating greater breastfeeding competency. Lower level, medium level and higher level are 38–89, 90–140 and 141–190 respectively. Type-D Scale-14 (DS14) was used to investigate the type D personality of pregnant women. A multivariable linear regression was used to examine the independent predictors of breastfeeding competency. A total of 550 questionnaires were collected and finally 525 effective questionnaires were collected. The age of 525 pregnant women is (30.24 ± 3.954) years old. The breastfeeding competency score of pregnant women was (134 ± 19.741). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that higher breastfeeding competency in pregnant women were reported among pregnant women who gestational age ≥ 256 days (37 weeks) (B = 8.494, p < 0.001), the previous breastfeeding experience were exclusive breastfeeding (B = 17.384, p < 0.001) and partial breastfeeding (B = 16.878, p < 0.001), participating in pregnant women school 2–3 times (B = 10.968, p = 0.013) and ≥ 5 times (B = 13.731, p = 0.034). Pregnant women with lower breastfeeding competency were found in women who were judged to have type D personality (B = − 6.358, p < 0.001). The result can explain 25.8% of the variation in the total breastfeeding competency score. This should be considered an important issue by maternal and child health care in the medical system that the moderate level of breastfeeding capacity among pregnant women. Differentiated and targeted breastfeeding support and services for pregnant women should be carried out based on influencing factors of breastfeeding competency.
Breast milk is a normal special food for infants which provides all the nutrients for the first 6 months of life1,2. Breast milk is the best nutrition for infants which can improve health across the life span and bring enormous benefits to society and families3,4. Promoting breastfeeding can increase family income by protecting the growth and development of infants and promoting women’s postpartum recovery, which can bring more labor and demographic dividends to society5,6,7. It can also achieve the purpose of reducing family and social medical expenses by decreasing the risk of short-term and long-term diseases of women and infants8,9.
Despite the many benefits of breastfeeding, breastfeeding practices in most countries are still below the recommended standards by the World Health Organization10. Globally, approximately 30% countries with an exclusive breastfeeding rate of less than 20% from 0 to 5 months, of which low and middle-income countries breastfeed longer than high-income countries11,12. 25.3% infants are exclusive breastfed at 0 to 5 months in China, and the prevalence of breastfeeding at 6 months is 34.7% in USA. In Turkey, the rate of infants who are exclusive breastfed is 46.90%12. It brings a hidden danger to maternal and infant health, family security, and social development. The issues among physiology, psychology, and social cultures such as mother-infant separation, low breastfeeding knowledge, and self-efficacy could be experienced by pregnant women13.
Almost all pregnant women have enough milk for breastfeeding, and only 5% of pregnant women may experience physiological insufficient milk14. But breastfeeding, as a complex behavior of women, is affected by many factors such as physiology, psychology, and social culture. Predicting breastfeeding behavior solely from breastfeeding knowledge, skills, intentions or social culture is not comprehensive9. Conceptual Model of Components of an Enabling Environment for Breastfeeding was established by Nigel C Rollins to explain factors that influence early initiation to continue breastfeeding9. Structural level, settings factor, and individual level were included in this conceptual Model. The structural level includes the attitude towards breastfeeding in the sociocultural and market context15. Settings factor include legislation, policy, support from health systems, and workplace protections for breastfeeding practices. The individual level includes physiology, psychology, breastfeeding skills, lifestyle of pregnant women, etc.16. Therefore, predicting the occurrence of breastfeeding behaviors and positive breastfeeding experiences requires a comprehensive evaluation of psychological, physical, and social background.
Based on the perspective of competence, breastfeeding competence is defined as the mastery of different breastfeeding factors, such as cognition, knowledge, and skills, which intervene in breastfeeding behavior on the basis of understanding, controlling, and grasping these factors at the same time17. Research from the point of breastfeeding competency and unified control of various factors could maximize the effect of breastfeeding intervention and achieve the purpose of effectively promoting breastfeeding17,18. However, most studies focus on breastfeeding outcomes and their influencing factors19,20, few studies focus on breastfeeding based on the perspective of competence and analyze the influencing factors of breastfeeding competency at present. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to identifying the status and independent risk factors for breastfeeding competency among pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy, to provide references for the development and update of breastfeeding competency and behavior management in the future.
This cross-sectional survey was carried out from September 2019 to November 2019 in Weifang, China. Pregnant women who recruited from two provincial general hospitals by convenient sampling were invited to participate in the study. The questionnaires were collected by a combination of online questionnaires and paper questionnaires, and participants chose either one method to complete in the department of gynaecology and obstetrics. The inclusion criteria which the participants should meet were whole-pregnancy examinations performed in this hospital, being in the third trimester, and volunteering to participate independently. The exclusion criteria were inability to understand the content of the scale after detailed explanation and/or contraindications to breastfeeding.
In the department of gynaecology and obstetrics, consent forms were distributed to pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, while standardized explanations of the research objectives, procedures, and questionnaires were given to the pregnant women to ensure their full understanding. After agreeing to participate, pregnant women completed questionnaires using online questionnaires and paper questionnaires. The questionnaires were completed on the day or they were sent to the researchers during the next hospital visit. The researchers collected the online and paper questionnaires on the day or next hospital visit, strictly reviewed the filling of the questionnaires, and summarized the data of online and paper questionnaires. We increased the study size to 550 to allow for possible data loss due to clinical conditions. Finally, 525 effective questionnaires were collected. The response rate was 95.45%.
General information of pregnant women consisted of age (< 35, ≥ 35), gestational week (days, < 259, ≥ 259), educational background (College diploma below, College diploma, Bachelor, Master or higher), occupation (Administrative, medical, Clerk, Professional, Freelance and others), monthly income (yuan, < 5000, 5000–, 10,000–, 15,000–, ≥ 20,000), Husband’s educational background (College diploma below, College diploma, Bachelor, Master or higher), husband’s occupation (Administrative, medical, Clerk, Professional, Freelance and others), previous breastfeeding experience (none, first born, exclusive breastfeeding, partial breastfeeding, artificial feeding), Residency (registered urban residents, registered rural residence), Pregnant women school attendance (times, 0, 1–2, 3–4, ≥ 5), Application (APP) usage (days per week, 0, 1–2, 3–4, ≥ 5).
The 38-item Breastfeeding Competency Scale was developed and based on the competency iceberg model and referenced the other scale17,21,22,23. The competency iceberg model was established to explain factors that development and translation of competency, which includes four part: knowledge, skills, self-concept, traits,and motivation17,24. BCS could break down breastfeeding competency into different parts that are easier to assess and reliably represent and evaluate breastfeeding competency17. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ‘completely no corresponding’ to 5 ‘completely corresponding’. The total score of the BCS ranges from 38 to 190, with higher scores indicating greater breastfeeding competency. Using the fractional three-point method, 38–89 as a lower level, 90–140 as a medium level, and 141–190 as a higher level. The The BCS has good reliability and validity (Cronbach’ s alpha of 0.970 and CFA model showed that the 4-factor model fits the data well). The Cronbach’ s alpha coefficients of BCS is 0.925 in this study.
Type D personality was measured with Type-D Scale-14 (DS14), including both subscales of negative emotion and social inhibition. Participants were asked to rate the truthfulness of statements from 0 to 4. Type D personality was diagnosed when the negative affect scale and the social inhibition scale have scores of 10 or more. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.87, indicating that it has good reliability25.
The protocol for this study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Weifang Medical University (2019SL060). Written informed consents were obtained from the all participants and their personal information was kept strictly confidential. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations including the Declaration of Helsinki.
The statistical analysis was using SPSS version 23.0 or AMOS version 23.0. Descriptive analyses were conducted to present the frequency (percentage) and means (standard deviations, SDs) of the general information about pregnant women. Univariate analysis of breastfeeding competency level was analyzed using t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Analysis of multicollinearity among different factors using tolerance and VIF value. A multivariable linear regression with the enter method was used to examine the independent predictors of breastfeeding competency. P < 0.05 was chosen for the statistical significance assessment.
The age of 525 pregnant women is (30.24 ± 3.954) years old and the gestational week is (243.03 ± 22.556) days, of which 291 (55.43%) people with registered urban residents and 234 (44.57%) people with registered rural residence. There were 66 (12.57%) participants with college diploma below, 143 (27.24%) participants with college diploma, 237 (45.41%) participants with bachelor, and 70 (13.33%) participants with master or higher. The husband’ s educational background is a college diploma below 68 (12.95%), college diploma 142 (27.05%), bachelor 233 (44.38%), and master or higher 82 (15.62%). A total of 183 (34.56%) people were type D personality, and 342 (65.14%) people were non-type D personality (See Table 1).
The mean of breastfeeding competency was (138.93 ± 20.798) points, of which “breastfeeding knowledge” dimension was (57.62 ± 9.098), “breastfeeding skill” dimension was (40.71 ± 5.480), “management of breast-milk” dimension was (13.33 ± 3.146), “self-concept and psychology” dimension was (27.27 ± 6.116). This indicating that the breastfeeding competency of pregnant women was at a moderate level (See Table 2).
The dependent variable is the breastfeeding competency score. The independent variables were age, gestational age, educational background, occupation, monthly income (yuan), husband’ s educational background, husband’ s occupation, previous breastfeeding experience, residency, pregnant women school attendance (times), app usage (days per week), and type D personality. Univariate analysis of breastfeeding competency level was carried out. There were statistically significant differences in breastfeeding competency among pregnant women with different characteristics. The results showed an upward trend with increasing age and gestational age. Pregnant women school attendance had a significant impact on the breastfeeding competency of pregnant women. This study showed that pregnant women with type D personality have lower breastfeeding competency than those others (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in pregnant women education and occupation, husband’ s educational background and occupation, and app usage on breastfeeding ability (See Table 1).
The score of breastfeeding competency was taken as the dependent variable, and some factors (age, gestational age, previous breastfeeding experience, and pregnant women school attendance) were taken as independent variables for multivariate analysis, after comprehensively considering the clinical practical significance and results of univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using the enter method to explore the influencing factors of breastfeeding competency level. The results of this study showed that pregnant women with higher breastfeeding competency were found to have a gestational age ≥ 256 days (37 weeks) (B = 8.494, SE = 1.718, p < 0.001); the previous breastfeeding experience were exclusive (B = 17.384, SE = 1.991, p < 0.001) and partial feeding (B = 16.878, SE = 2.391, p < 0.001); participating in pregnant women school 2–3 times (B = 10.968, SE = 4.381, p = 0.013) and ≥ 5 times (B = 13.731, SE = 6.463, p = 0.034). Pregnant women with lower breastfeeding competency were found in women with D-type personality (B = − 6.358, SE = 1.665, p < 0.001). It can explain 25.8% of the variation in the total breastfeeding competency score. There was no multicollinearity in the results, which indicates that all factors in the model were independent predictors of breastfeeding competency (Durbin-Watson value = 1.867, VIF = 1.019–1.262, tolerance = 0.793–0.982). There was no significant interaction between breastfeeding competency and the other factors included in the model (p > 0.05) (Table 3).
Pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy had a moderate level of breastfeeding competency. Among the 4 dimensions, breastfeeding knowledge has the highest score, and the management of breast-milk score is the lowest. The results indicate that pregnant women place greater emphasis on breastfeeding knowledge than management of breast-milk, which could negatively impact breastfeeding behavior and lead to a decline in breastfeeding rates. Although pregnant women generally understand the protective effects of breastfeeding and have the high intention of breastfeeding, they are not clear about the detailed knowledge and skills of breastfeeding26. When pregnant women have difficulty breastfeeding, they choose to add formula milk to their newborns27. The level of breastfeeding knowledge, skills, and intention of supporters also affects the improvement of pregnant women breastfeeding competency28.
According to The competency iceberg model, the Conceptual Model of Components of an Enabling Environment for Breastfeeding, and the issues experienced by pregnant women in China9,13,17,24, we summarized the factors that include breastfeeding knowledge and skills, self-concept, and traits of pregnant women could influence the breastfeeding competency. So we chose the factors including age, gestational week, educational background, type D personality, and so on of pregnant women or their husbands to investigate the independent risk factors for breastfeeding competency. The analysis showed that higher breastfeeding competency in pregnant women were reported among pregnant women who gestational age ≥ 256 days (37 weeks), the previous breastfeeding experience were exclusive breastfeeding and partial breastfeeding, participating in pregnant women school 2–3 times and ≥ 5 times. Pregnant women with lower breastfeeding competency were found in women who were judged to have type D personality.
This study showed that full-term pregnant women [gestational age ≥ 256 days (37 weeks)] had more breastfeeding competency than pregnant women in nearly full-term [gestational age < 256 days (37 weeks)]. This result may be explained by different attention to different gestational weeks knowledge among pregnant women and health care personnel. In the 10-week prenatal education designed by Leslie McCormack according to Maslow’ s Hierarchy of Needs, breastfeeding is placed in the second half of the whole course because of the development of gestational weeks29. Meanwhile, pregnant women have absolute autonomy in choosing prenatal education, and the development of their perinatal health care capacity is more controlled by themselves. Nearly full-term pregnant women pay more attention to fetal growth and development, while full-term pregnant women pay more attention to breastfeeding30. Therefore, different level of the breastfeeding competency of pregnant women in different gestational weeks may be because of the changing attention of pregnant women and health care personnel to perinatal knowledge. Pregnant women in nearly full-term delay or give up breastfeeding due to their low breastfeeding competency whose baby may not be protected by breast milk without delay against various risks associated with premature birth.
Experienced pregnant women who breastfed previously who were more likely to start or continue breastfeeding than inexperienced pregnant women31, similar to the results of this study. Previous breastfeeding experience could improve pregnant women breastfeeding competency by increasing breastfeeding knowledge, skills, and attitudes, which directly or indirectly affects breastfeeding behaviors32. In addition, guiding pregnant women to recall previous positive breastfeeding behaviors can increase breastfeeding self-efficacy23,31. Therefore, the importance of breastfeeding behaviors should not only be emphasized in prenatal education to help experienced mothers start breastfeeding. It should be more important to pay attention to breastfeeding behaviors of primiparas to help the development of breastfeeding competency in re-pregnancy and reduce the risk of delaying or giving up breastfeeding.
Prenatal education for pregnant women with breastfeeding as its content could promote the development of their breastfeeding competency. Health education in the healthcare centers was more effective than in other departments in the hospital, which is reflecting the importance of pregnant women school in improving breastfeeding competency and behaviors33. The study showed that pregnant women can gain more perinatal knowledge through prenatal education provided by pregnant women school34. Breastfeeding courses, support, and information provided by pregnant women school could increase breastfeeding confidence, and provide knowledge and skills to help pregnant women provide breastfeeding for a longer period of time35. The research by J L Guo showed that breastfeeding intervention based on the theory of planned behavior can promote breastfeeding by breaking down breastfeeding behavior36. Compared with the traditional breastfeeding prenatal education, theory-based education in pregnant women school can increase breastfeeding self-efficacy and improve breastfeeding competency37. Therefore, breastfeeding interventions could maximize the effect by using theory-based pregnant women school education.
Type D personality is a special personality type with both negative affectivity and social inhibition38. People with type D personality have the feeling of depression, worry, neuroticism, introversion, and often feel unsafe and anxious in interactions with other people39. This study showed that pregnant women with type D personality had lower breastfeeding competency than others, which could be explained by the influence of negative psychological on breastfeeding. Pregnant women with an extroverted nature have decisiveness and positive emotions, and show more potential in starting or continuing breastfeeding40. In contrast, pregnant women with neuroticism, anxiety, and depression shilly-shally to make breastfeeding decisions and have lower breastfeeding competency than others41. The reason may be that pregnant women with an extroverted and openness nature can seek initial common breastfeeding problems more easily and have more sensitive to their children’ s needs than pregnant women with negative psychological, which help them provide early initiation to continued breastfeeding42.
The study also had two limitations. First, only pregnant women in the third trimester were invited and two hospitals were included in this study. Although this research content was explained to pregnant women in detail before they were invited to participate in this study, the results is not representative of pregnant women in China and not reflect the influencing factors on breastfeeding competency in the other pregnancy status. So, this limitation may reduce the representativeness of the results in China. Second, the influencing factors included in this study could only explain 25.8% of the variability in the breastfeeding competency score, indicating that other important influencing factors have not yet been discovered. Therefore, more factors such as the quality of the prenatal education provided, the breastfeeding experience of female relatives, pregnant women’ s work should be included to verify the influencing factors of breastfeeding competency.
Pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy had a moderate level of breastfeeding competency. Gestational week, previous breastfeeding patterns, participation in pregnant women school, and type D personality were independent factors of breastfeeding competency. This provides a basis for health care personnel to improve the breastfeeding rate by adjusting the prenatal education model, improving the level of breast-milk management, and paying attention to type D personality pregnant women and other interventions in future research.At the same time, in order to comprehensively promote the breastfeeding rate from the point of breastfeeding competency, we could control and grasp knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, social support, and other contents together at the same time. Therefore, an intervention study of breastfeeding competency could be considered a new way to improve the breastfeeding rate in the next step. Meanwhile, the influencing factors of breastfeeding competency should be comprehensively considered in the intervention studies to meet the demand for breastfeeding support among different types of pregnant women.
The data analyzed in this study are not publicly available due to privacy policy, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Breastfeeding competency scale
Standard deviations
Variance inflation factor
Social ecological theory
Analysis of variance
Colombo, L. et al. Breastfeeding determinants in healthy term newborns. Nutrients 10(1), 48 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Esteves, T. M., Daumas, R. P., Oliveira, M. I., Andrade, C. A. & Leite, I. C. Factors associated to breastfeeding in the first hour of life: systematic review. Rev. Saude Publica 48(4), 697–708 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Victora, C. G. et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet (London, England) 387(10017), 475–490 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Bryanton, J. et al. Relationships among factors related to childbirth and breastfeeding outcomes in primiparous women. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. (JOGNN) 49(5), 437–451 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Stenberg, K. et al. Advancing social and economic development by investing in women’s and children’s health: A new Global Investment Framework. Lancet (London, England) 383(9925), 1333–1354 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Victora, C. G. et al. Association between breastfeeding and intelligence, educational attainment, and income at 30 years of age: A prospective birth cohort study from Brazil. Lancet Global Health 3(4), e199-205 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Bobrow, K. L., Quigley, M. A., Green, J., Reeves, G. K. & Beral, V. Persistent effects of women’s parity and breastfeeding patterns on their body mass index: results from the Million Women Study. Int. J. Obes. 37(5), 712–717 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Peres, K. G., Cascaes, A. M., Nascimento, G. G. & Victora, C. G. Effect of breastfeeding on malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. (Oslo, Norway : 1992) 104(467), 54–61 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Rollins, N. C. et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?. Lancet (London, England) 387(10017), 491–504 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S. & Kakuma, R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8, cd003517 (2012).
Google Scholar
Black, R. E. et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet (London, England) 382(9890), 427–451 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Tableau Public UaW. Rates of Exclusive Breastfeeding in Infants <6 Months. https://public.tableau.com/profile/gbc2364#!/vizhome/GBC_Global_Indicators/GLOBALINDICATORS?publish=yes. Accessed 1 Aug 2019 (2019).
Ke, S. L., Leng, H. Y., Tang, Y. M. & Zheng, X. L. Construction of a breastfeeding follow-up checklist for discharged newborns. Chin. J. Nurs. 57(16), 1962–1969 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hector, D. & King, L. Interventions to encourage and support breastfeeding. N. S. W. Public Health Bull. 16(4), 56–61 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Cattaneo, A. Academy of breastfeeding medicine founder’s lecture 2011: Inequalities and inequities in breastfeeding: an international perspective. Breastfeed Med 7(1), 3–9 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Lawton, R., Ashley, L., Dawson, S., Waiblinger, D. & Conner, M. Employing an extended theory of planned behaviour to predict breastfeeding intention, initiation, and maintenance in White British and South-Asian mothers living in Bradford. Br. J. Health Psychol. 17(4), 854–871 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Wu, Y. et al. Breastfeeding competency scale (BCS); Development and validation of an evaluation instrument on breastfeeding competency in third trimester pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 21(1), 179 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Weinert, F.E.J.I.E.o.t.S. Competencies and key competencies: Educational perspective. Sciences B 2433–2436 (2001).
Zhang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, L. & Wan, H. What factors influence exclusive breastfeeding based on the theory of planned behaviour. Midwifery 2018(62), 177–182 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Li, L. et al. Meta-analysis of influencing factors of exclusive breastfeeding for infants within 6 months in China. Maternal Child Health Care China 22, 5359–5363 (2021).
Google Scholar
Da, H. Competencies: The right foundation for effective human resources management. Compens. Benefits Rev. 28(6), 54–55 (1996).
Google Scholar
Dennis, C. L. Theoretical underpinnings of breastfeeding confidence: A self-efficacy framework. J. Hum. Lactation 15(3), 195–201 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, M. Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy among Beijing New Mothers (Peking Union Medical College, 2008).
Google Scholar
McClelland, C. D. Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. Am. Psychol. 28(1), 1–14 (1973).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Denollet, J. DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and type D personality. Psychosom. Med. 67(1), 89–97 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jin, Y., Vereijken, C., Stahl, B. & Jiang, H. Breastfeeding experience, challenges and service demands among Chinese mothers: A qualitative study in two cities. Appetite 128, 263–270 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Fei, Y., Zhang, Z. Y., Fu, W. N., Wang, L. & Mao, J. Why do first-time mothers not intend to breastfeed?—A qualitative exploratory study on the decision-making of non-initiation in Jingzhou, China. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 22(1), 183 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Feldman-Winter, L. et al. Residency curriculum improves breastfeeding care. Pediatrics 126(2), 289–297 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
McCormack, L. et al. The development and implementation of an advanced practice registered nurse-led prenatal education program for housing insecure women. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Pract. 33(12), 1111–1115 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Fan, X. & Wang, L. Investigation on the demand of knowledge of pregnant women during different stages pregnancy. Chin. J. Nurs. 41(9), 858–860 (2006).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Ouyang, Y. Q. & Redding, S. R. Previous breastfeeding experience and its influence on breastfeeding outcomes in subsequent births: A systematic review. Women Birth J. Aust. Coll. Midwives 32(4), 303–309 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Moimaz, S. A. S., Rocha, N. B., Garbin, C. A. S., Rovida, T. A. & Saliba, N. A. Factors affecting intention to breastfeed of a group of Brazilian childbearing women. Women Birth J. Aust. Coll. Midwives 30(2), e119–e124 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maleki, A., Faghihzadeh, E. & Youseflu, S. The effect of educational intervention on improvement of breastfeeding self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2021, 5522229 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Benzies, K. M., Barker, L., Churchill, J., Smith, J. & Horn, S. UpStart parent survey-prenatal: A new tool for evaluating prenatal education programs. Public Health Nurs. (Boston, Mass) 33(5), 440–448 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Haroon, S., Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., Imdad, A. & Bhutta, Z. A. Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 13(Suppl 3), S20 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Guo, J. L., Wang, T. F., Liao, J. Y. & Huang, C. M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior in predicting breastfeeding: Meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Appl. Nurs. Res. (ANR) 29, 37–42 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chipojola, R., Chiu, H. Y., Huda, M. H., Lin, Y. M. & Kuo, S. Y. Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 109, 103675 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Denollet, J. et al. Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet (London, England) 347(8999), 417–421 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tola, E. N., Eris Yalcin, S., Dugan, N. & Oral, B. The association of type D personality and depression with infertility in women. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 41(2), 98–105 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Padashian, F., Yadollahi, P., Doostfatemeh, M. & Moshfeghy, Z. Examining exclusive breastfeeding in Iranian mothers using the five-factor model of personality traits. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 17(1), 51–56 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ystrom, E. Breastfeeding cessation and symptoms of anxiety and depression: A longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 12, 36 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Keller, N., Medved, V. & Armano, G. The influence of maternal personality and risk factors for impaired mother-infant bonding on breastfeeding duration. Breastfeed Med. 11(10), 532–537 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Download references
The authors would like to express their thanks to all the women who completed the questionnaires enabling this study to be conducted.
This study was funded by grants from the 2021–2022 Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University Nursing Scientific Research Project (Grant number: HL2021-03) and Humanities and Social Sciences Projects in Shandong Province (Grant number: 2020-NDGL-34). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and in interpretation and writing of the manuscript.
These authors contributed equally: Yu Wu and Wenwen Liu.
Delivery Room, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 9677 Jingshi Street, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
Yu Wu, Qian Pi & Jinxiang Lu
School of Nursing, Weifang Medical University, 7166 Baotong West Street, Weifang, 261053, Shandong, China
Wenwen Liu, Ying Wang & Aihua Wang
Department of Nursing, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 9677 Jingshi Street, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
Xia Liu & Xin Zhao
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University, 16766 Jingshi Street, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China
Yunfeng Li
People’s Hospital of Lixia District of Jinan, 73 Wenhua West Street, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China
Yanxin Chu
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Y.Wu., Y.Wa., A.W. and Y.L. designed the study; Y.Wu., Y.C., Q.P. and X.Z. acquired the data; Y.Wu., X.L., Y.Wa. and J.L. analysed the data; W.L., Y.C., Q.P. and X.Z. interpreted the data; Y.Wu. and W.L. drafted this manuscript; and Y.Wu., X.L., J.L. and A.W. provided critical intellectual feedback to help revise the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Jinxiang Lu or Aihua Wang.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Wu, Y., Liu, W., Liu, X. et al. Breastfeeding competency and its influencing factors among pregnant women in third trimester pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 13, 1240 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28477-4
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28477-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Advertisement
© 2023 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
